Size about 14 mm. Much less contrast in the wing pattern than the one from O'Connor.
A question for the moderators: should I enter repeat sightings, or only put in a sighting for a species at one location once?
As far as I know there are no firm guidelines on this, except self-imposed ones. Personally, I don't usually submit repeat observations of moth species for the same site (except if doing a survey) , but I do for significantly different new locations e.g, in a reserve or different habitat, greater than about 100m away from a site or in a different Naturemapr region. This means I am ignoring posting photos of what are for me, very common moths (e.g. Olbonoma triptycha, Scopula rubraria etc.) . I do seek to re-submit the same species at a site where a different sex is apparent or when its identifiably the same species but a different form - whether recognised or not. I'm assuming we want to derive maps of distribution of species, link them to habitat if possible, but not create too large a database of repeat observations which serve no real scientific purpose. Hope this helps, but its a worthwhile set of issues to raise. However, there can also be exceptions to such rules because, for example, we might want to identify when a species is active/flowering etc. at sites at different times of the year, so observations at the same pre-defined sites over time would be actively sought (e.g. as for the orchid survey).
Thanks, I was trying to follow a similar set of rules, but was not clear about how much interest there would be in collecting data about seasonal trends, i.e. at what time of year a species is present. Although this is a repeat observation, I will not remove it to leave the discussion visible (and also because there are very few sightings of this species, which you recently suggested is actually common).
Similar enough for me, but I may be wrong. No this species has not yet been commonly generally, but I think it will be now that its has been recognised. locally I was just referring to 2 other species that are very common at my home address and on CNM generally. iNaturalist automatically gives a month by month time series graphic plot updated for each new observation of a species for a region, but that is a feature we don.'t have on CNM.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,157,619 sightings of 19,989 species in 6,548 locations from 11,650 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.