Rosa canina is less thorny than the common Rosa rubiginosa. The lack of hairs on the stalk of the flower and fruit is a good diagnostic feature. I think the sepals are shorter and less persistent on R. canina but I have not checked any botanical keys for this.
Neither Plantnet nor Vicflora say anything about sepal length. Vicflora states that in canina, the sepals are strongly reflexed (turned back) after flowering, and the sepals of rubiginosa are hardly refexed after flowering, and spiny!
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,166,933 sightings of 20,573 species in 6,800 locations from 11,955 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.