TEST

Noctuoid moths (except Arctiinae)


This moth sub-category for the superfamily Noctuoidea contains the large families Noctuidae and Erebidae as well the smaller Euteliidae, Nolidae, Notodontidae and Oenosandridae.  The Arctiinae also belong to this superfamily, but are distinctive and well known so are given their own moth sub-category


Noctuoid moths (except Arctiinae)

Announcements

Discussion

donhe wrote:
13 Dec 2024
Nola aenictis ?

Nola (genus)
WendyEM wrote:
11 Dec 2024
From Moths of Victoria Pt. 9 CD pages
- looks like a good match for Proteuxoa adelopa type specimen from S.A. Museum.
- alternately maybe a female P. tibiata

Proteuxoa tibiata
kasiaaus wrote:
10 Dec 2024
Wow Ian, you have done an amazing amount of work on this. Thank you. I agree that the Proteuxoa provisional species 2 sightings are very likely the same moth.

Thoracolopha argonephra
ibaird wrote:
10 Dec 2024
The suggested species name Proteuxoa argonephra is used by iNaturalist for sightings from both WA and eastern Victoria similar to this one, however the AFD which NatureMapr and the AFD uses as its authority for named moths to species level appears to prefer Thorocolpha argonephra which the ALA apparently uses in preference (following a co-authored revision (Hitchcock, Edwards et al 2017 of species sightings including those formerly called P. argonephra (Edwards et al 1996)). from WA. see here:-
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/a9bdb3d1-b3fd-41fa-9058-675c592699d9
So to be consistent with our naming policy I suggest T. argonephra
However moths appearing on the ALA given this name include sightings which vary sigficantly in appearance , including some with a prominent reniform mark on the forewing which is apparently absent here.
I would also observe that this moth looks similar to sightings we have been placing in our working category ''Proteuxoa provisional species 2'' whichi includes sightings simialar to MoV's 'Proteuxoa sp.(5). Part 9 (Marriot 2020))'. MoV does not include P. argonephra as one of its recognised named species in the Proteuxoa genus (Marriott, 2020).

Thoracolopha argonephra
donhe wrote:
3 Dec 2024
I think the larvae of both species have more variations within each species than the differences between the species, and cannot be identified to species level from superficial photographs.

Helicoverpa (genus)
1,893,031 sightings of 21,044 species in 9,272 locations from 12,889 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.