TEST

Austroargiolestes sp. (genus)

Flatwing at Gibraltar Pines

Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) at Gibraltar Pines - 24 Nov 2023 10:32 AM
Request use of media

Identification history

Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes sp. (genus) 6 Mar 2024 HarveyPerkins
Austroargiolestes icteromelas 12 Dec 2023 SWishart
Austroargiolestes icteromelas 12 Dec 2023 SWishart
Austroargiolestes icteromelas 12 Dec 2023 SWishart

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

47 comments

HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
HarveyPerkins wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
I'm not 100% convinced - I think this could be a Powdered Flatwing.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.
KorinneM wrote:
   5 Mar 2024
@HarveyPerkins I've removed my suggestion from it. If we can't say 100% either way, did you just want to put it as Austroargiolestes sp. ? Or are you confident enough to go Powdered Flatwing? I honestly can't remember why I went that way with the ID now.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Additional information

  • 25mm to 50mm Animal size

Species information

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,904,751 sightings of 21,315 species from 13,114 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.