The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
The spacing between the prolegs and the claspers in this specimen is much greater than in most Geometridae., which generally sit on these 4 feet as a combined support. The body looks to me more like that of an Erebidae, but all the ones with reduced prolegs in that family, that I know of, still have 2 or 3 unatrophied pairs of prolegs.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Thanks, but sadly most Lepidoptera taxonomy has been done on adult insects, so identifying a larva is fraught, unless it can be taken into captivity to protect it from predators, and reared to obtain the adult.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,904,751 sightings of 21,315 species from 13,114 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.