Water Plantain at Mitchell, ACT
Identification history
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
18 comments
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
JaneR
wrote:
27 Nov 2024
At this stage (with no flowers, no fruits), Alisma plantago-aquatica is virtually indistinguishable from Damasonium minus (both in same family), and there is no visual evidence as to what species this is.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
However, it is very likely that this is Alisma plantago-aquatica. This species has been occasionally recorded in some years (depending on seasonal conditions) in seasonally or intermittently or occasionally wet places (drainage lines, streams, edges of wetlands and rivers) in the ACT whereas Damasonium minus has not: it seems to have a lower altitude / slighter warmer climate distribution pattern.
So, based on distribution patterns, and occurrence in other ACT grassland reserves, I consider this is Alisma plantago-aquatica.
And yes, it would be good to have a photo once the plant has flowered and fruiting. For that, best to focus on the fruits (the flowers are tiny and a bit challenging). Common name for Damasonium minus is 'Starfruit' and Sighting 4555224 shows why.
It is good to see this species turning up in grassland nature parks.
Location information
- Coordinates 149.124650-35.209369
- Altitude 551.6m
- Maps Gungaderra Grasslands
- Places Mitchell, ACT
Sighting information
- At least 1 Abundance
- 24 Nov 2024 07:50 PM Recorded on
- Woozlecat Recorded by
-
Collections
Plants Other Fresh Water Plants Woozlecat Canberra & Southern Tablelands NatureMapr
Additional information
- 10cm to 30cm Plant height
Species information
- Alisma plantago-aquatica Scientific name
- Water Plantain Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Rare or uncommon native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- Up to 681.17m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
- External link More information
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
