What do you think about reasons for identifying as *Bulbine bulbosa* ? Cf. *Bulbine glauca* ? I'm checking your photograph closely now looking at botanical key features shown in it. Any more photographs available please, especially of the foliage and close–up focus on one healthy flower ? For example one key feature visible here, yes, the hairs on the stamens occur far enough below the anthers for *B. glauca* (not *B. bulbosa*).
References (in brief, without full citations):
• Australian Plant Name Index (APNI) and Australian Plant Census (APC) (2024): *Bulbine* → https://biodiversity.org.au/nsl/services/search/names?product=APNI&tree.id=&name=Bulbine&inc._scientific=&inc.scientific=on&inc._cultivar=&inc._other=&max=100&display=&search=true
• Flora of NSW online PlantNet: *Bulbine* → https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=gn&name=Bulbine .
• Flora of Vic. online VicFlora: * Bulbine* key to species → https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/flora/key/2106 .
• Flora of Au. online: *Bulbine* key to species → https://profiles.ala.org.au/opus/foa/profile/Bulbine .
I have undone your accidental phone screen tap of *B. bulbosa* as a suggested identification, so you can redo the identification to *B. glauca*. The first hand sighting author's identification has most importance.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,885,552 sightings of 21,531 species from 13,437 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.