Cooma North Ridge Reserve
Identification history
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
User's notes
prostrate at base of rock
105 comments
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Venture
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
At first I believed that this was D. Sericea but then I realised that the photos were kind of hard to identify and could only be identified as a Dillwynia sp.
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Tapirlord
wrote:
7 Jul 2024
Very much understandable in that case! I might've leaned over toward D.sericea ordinarily but honestly you're right, it's never a bad idea to be cautious. Let's leave things at genus :)
Location information
- Coordinates 149.120286-36.206125
- Altitude 918.7m
- Maps Cooma North Ridge Reserve
- Places Cooma, NSW
Sighting information
- 4 - 15 Abundance
- 19 May 2024 03:02 PM Recorded on
- mahargiani Recorded by
-
Collections
Plants Peas mahargiani Canberra & Southern Tablelands NatureMapr
Additional information
- Less than 10cm Plant height
Species information
- Dillwynia sp. Scientific name
- Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Local native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- Up to 1246m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
