Swamp Foxtail at Belconnen, ACT
Identification history
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
User's notes
Public
104 comments
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
18 Apr 2024
Ciaran - I think you are right (thank goodness) but can you please check with your grass contact
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Tapirlord
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
From Alan: The hand photograph shows that the spikelets are not bristly as what occurs for Cenchrus setaceus. They are very hard to separate from a distant view as in Pics 1,5 & 6 (1,2,3 in this case)
Location information
- Coordinates 149.066655-35.222440
- Altitude 600.0m
- Places Belconnen, ACT
Sighting information
- 16 - 100 Abundance
- 8 Apr 2024 10:06 AM Recorded on
- Jiggy Recorded by
-
Collections
Plants Grasses Jiggy Canberra & Southern Tablelands NatureMapr
Additional information
- 30cm to 1 metre Plant height
- False In flower
Species information
- Cenchrus purpurascens Scientific name
- Swamp Foxtail Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Local native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- Up to 843.59m Recorded at altitude
- 70 images trained Machine learning
-
In flower
- External link More information
-
Synonyms
Pennisetum alopecuroides
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
