Is the ID based mainly on location? or some other feature? I have been told I have brown antechinus which I think are supposed to come as far south as Kialoa. I have been wondering if I have both brown and agile (being at the southern and northern ends of their respective distributions. I am also wondering how I could possibly tell them apart if I do.
Hi ajay, I haven't IDd a Brown (stuartii) before and the species is not even included in our Canberra list. But you're right. This is a fair bit darker than the local Agiles. According to Menkhorst, Agiles are greyer brown and Browns are more chocolate brown. So I'm unsure but in retrospect I think is it is more likely to be stuartii.
I doubt that the boundary between agilis and stuartii is known well, or even whether the two are exclusive or overlapping. After a few more years when you have a few more records, it may be necessary to go back and revise some of these IDs.
Thanks heaps. I thought they looked a little different to each other which is why I queried it and put the second photo up. We also had a wildlife carer looking after some orphans recently and she said those had been identified as browns. I will also ask a local mammals expert (but not a taxonomist) and see what she says and let you know if she comes up with something different. We have a similar problem with the sugar/squirrel gliders both of which I think occur here.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,166,933 sightings of 20,573 species in 6,800 locations from 11,955 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.