Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
Would you happen to have any other images of this plant(s)? These look a little different to typical D. decurvum, but I am not sure if it is just the green colouration.
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
@MattM , I only had a couple of out of focus shots in addition to the three in the sighting. I have added one of them, and also added a crop of the third photo, so you get a closer image. But I'm not sure specifically what you wanted to see in more detail, is it the flower from a different angle, or a leaf?
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
Thanks Christine. I particularly wanted to see an image of the flower from the side. While a clear photograph is ideal, a slightly blurry photo of the plant from the side may still be adequate as I would be able to see the profile of the orchid (as in image 5). Looking at the way the sinus (the lower lip of the mouth) projects forward I am inclined to tentatively call this D. atrans.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
@TobiasHayashi could you have a look at this one? The colouration, shape of the sinus, and short lateral sepals (with clubs?) look a bit atypical for D. decurvum.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,904,751 sightings of 21,315 species from 13,114 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.