TEST
Insects
Beetles (Coleoptera)
Darkling beetles (Tenebrionidae)
Sighting 4428082

Adelium tenebroides

A darkling beetle at suppressed

Adelium tenebroides at suppressed - suppressed
Adelium tenebroides at suppressed - suppressed
Request use of media

Identification history

Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 12 Aug 2022 MichaelBedingfield
Adelium tenebroides 11 Aug 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium tenebroides 11 Aug 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium tenebroides 11 Aug 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium tenebroides 11 Aug 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium tenebroides 11 Aug 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium porcatum 29 Apr 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium porcatum 29 Apr 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium porcatum 29 Apr 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium porcatum 29 Apr 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium porcatum 29 Apr 2022 KimberiRP
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium pustulosum 17 Mar 2022 MichaelMulvaney
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata
Adelium porcatum 16 Mar 2022 Amata

Identify this sighting

Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

Found close to the Hairy Mary Caterpillar.

210 comments

MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
I think because the ridges on this beetles back are uninterupted that it is A. pustulosum rather than A. porcatum where the ridges are interrupted.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
Amata wrote:
   17 Mar 2022
Thanks, Michael. Adelium pustulosum appears to have a dark bronze body colour. This individual does not fit the description. From your comment, it does not sound like Adelium porcatum. I thought it was Adelium porcatum since the images on CNM looked most similar. We need an expert opinion on this.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   18 Mar 2022
Thanks Birdy
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
Amata wrote:
   28 Apr 2022
KimberiRP wrote:
   29 Apr 2022
The sculpture on the surface of the pronotum discounts A. pustulosum. I'll call it A. porcatum for now, but I'll check the image against ANIC material when I can.
KimberiRP wrote:
   29 Apr 2022
The sculpture on the surface of the pronotum discounts A. pustulosum. I'll call it A. porcatum for now, but I'll check the image against ANIC material when I can.
KimberiRP wrote:
   29 Apr 2022
The sculpture on the surface of the pronotum discounts A. pustulosum. I'll call it A. porcatum for now, but I'll check the image against ANIC material when I can.
KimberiRP wrote:
   29 Apr 2022
The sculpture on the surface of the pronotum discounts A. pustulosum. I'll call it A. porcatum for now, but I'll check the image against ANIC material when I can.
KimberiRP wrote:
   29 Apr 2022
The sculpture on the surface of the pronotum discounts A. pustulosum. I'll call it A. porcatum for now, but I'll check the image against ANIC material when I can.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   11 May 2022
Thanks Kim much appreciated
KimberiRP wrote:
   11 Aug 2022
Based on specimens in ANIC (CSIRO), this is most likely to be Adelium tenebroides Erichson (recorded from Tas, Vic, and Batlow NSW), although Adelium capitatum Lea (recorded from interior of NSW and Qld) is also like it.
KimberiRP wrote:
   11 Aug 2022
Based on specimens in ANIC (CSIRO), this is most likely to be Adelium tenebroides Erichson (recorded from Tas, Vic, and Batlow NSW), although Adelium capitatum Lea (recorded from interior of NSW and Qld) is also like it.
KimberiRP wrote:
   11 Aug 2022
Based on specimens in ANIC (CSIRO), this is most likely to be Adelium tenebroides Erichson (recorded from Tas, Vic, and Batlow NSW), although Adelium capitatum Lea (recorded from interior of NSW and Qld) is also like it.
KimberiRP wrote:
   11 Aug 2022
Based on specimens in ANIC (CSIRO), this is most likely to be Adelium tenebroides Erichson (recorded from Tas, Vic, and Batlow NSW), although Adelium capitatum Lea (recorded from interior of NSW and Qld) is also like it.
KimberiRP wrote:
   11 Aug 2022
Based on specimens in ANIC (CSIRO), this is most likely to be Adelium tenebroides Erichson (recorded from Tas, Vic, and Batlow NSW), although Adelium capitatum Lea (recorded from interior of NSW and Qld) is also like it.
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
   12 Aug 2022
Thanks Kim

Please Login or Register to comment.

Sighting information

Additional information

  • Ants will try to identify. Also a grey caterpillar. Associated Insect
  • 12mm to 25mm Animal size

Species information

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,904,751 sightings of 21,315 species from 13,114 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.