I generally agree that this moth appears to meet the detailed guidelines provided by Moths of Victoria (MOV), Part 5 for distinguishing Furcatrox spp. and its markings strongly suggest it corresponds with F. furneauxi. It certainly has a relatively tiny discal spot * which is specified in the criteria for that species. ALA shows F. furneauxi has been recorded in Tasmania (where the original taxonomic work has been done distinguishing the Furcatrox genus from Amelora, McQuillan 1996) and F. furneauxi has also been recorded in southern Victoria extending to east Gippsland. Bold Systems shows F. furneauxi occuring in Tasmania but not Victoria. There are no F. furneauxi records yet confirmed for NSW. MOV acknowledges that much more work needs to be done to establish the status and extent of occurence of the Furcatrox genus especially on the mainland. So, in the interests of furthering work and consideration of this I will suggest F. furneauxi as the species, but will also create the Furcatrox genus as well. * I note that this specimen seems to have an even smaller and tinier discal spot that the other examples of the F. furneauxi species I see illustrated on MOV and Bold Systems (BS4). I further note that ANIC recognises at least two un-named Furcatrox species for NSW and the ACT (see BS4). The un-named specimen of Furcatrox on BS4 for the ACT has a tiny discal spot.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,167,042 sightings of 20,573 species in 6,801 locations from 11,955 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.