1 A Gum Tree at Bumbalong, NSW
Identification history
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
User's notes
Plants returning after the Clear Range bushfire on 1 February 2020
72 comments
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelMulvaney
wrote:
8 May 2020
Leaves in E. pauciflora have parallel veins while this has standard min branching vein. Nprtoni is my best guess based on leaf shape, location and trunks
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
16 May 2020
Despite being difficult to ID to species, this is a valuable record of the devastation caused by the bushfires.
Location information
- Coordinates 149.115609-35.849499
- Altitude 927.9m
- Places Bumbalong, NSW
Sighting information
- 1,001 - 10,000 Abundance
- 27 Apr 2020 11:33 AM Recorded on
- Ad Recorded by
-
Collections
Plants Gum Trees AdamatBumbalong Canberra & Southern Tablelands NatureMapr
Additional information
- Greater than 5 metres Plant height
Species information
- Eucalyptus sp. Scientific name
- A Gum Tree Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Local native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- -13.81m to 1470m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
