Fair Footman at Ainslie, ACT
Identification history
| Thallarcha sparsana | 27 Apr 2020 | ibaird | ||
| Thallarcha sparsana | 27 Apr 2020 | GlennCocking | ||
| Unidentified | 23 Apr 2020 | donhe | ||
| Thallarcha fusa | 21 Apr 2020 | jb2602 |
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
8 comments
jb2602
wrote:
21 Apr 2020
Minor pectinations on antennae, not sure if this makes it a male or female. T. fusa male has long pectinations.
jb2602
wrote:
22 Apr 2020
There is a discrepancy between what you have up on Butterfly House and the description of T. fusa provided on MOV CD fusa complex.pdf.
donhe
wrote:
22 Apr 2020
There is a discrepancy between Hampson making a drawing of a T. fusa specimen from WA showing an extensive hindwing dark patch but in the text indicating that the patch and the cell marking are separate, and BOLD 's specimens showing a small dark patch on the hindwing and also occuring in the eastern states. The hindwing patch distinction is moot, as we have no direct view of the hindwings of this specimen. I suggest it is recorded as Thallarcha species.
ibaird
wrote:
23 Apr 2020
My suggestion of T. fusa is based primarily on the similarity of this specimen with the majority of forewing patterns visible for this species on both the ALA and Bold Systems 4. Despite the very long pectinations on the antennae visible on the historic LBH drawing of T. fusa, our specimen looks consistent to the pectination length visible on specimens of this species on Bold Systems 4. The forewing pattern is variable and it is perhaps sexually dimorphic in wing pattern as suggested by the LBH images; but with respect to hindwing pattern as seen from above as perhaps being different in males and females, that does not seem to be borne out in the Bold Systems 4 specimens. That is, there is at least one specimen there with antenna pectinations and a hindwing pattern with the cell marking separate from a reduced terminal hindwing patch. However, the MOV CD fusa complex.pdf clearly shows a male T . fusa with the cell marking closely adjacent to the hindwing patch which is also consistent with the historical LBH drawing by G. Hampson.
ibaird
wrote:
27 Apr 2020
Notwithstanding my comments T. fusa seems unlikely on the basis the pectinations on the male antennae are not long enough for T. fusa.
GlennCocking
wrote:
27 Apr 2020
I tried to lodge a comment when I proposed T. sparsanqa, but it has gone missing. The photo well matches T. sparsana specimens that I've been looking at. The main points are that T. fusa has a broader transverse band across the middle of the forewing, and several dark spots basal of it. T. sparsana has a narrower band and only a single spot inside the transverse band. Both differences are visible in the LBH photos.
Location information
- Coordinates 149.151961-35.259205
- Places Ainslie, ACT
Sighting information
- 1 Abundance
- 20 Apr 2020 08:07 PM Recorded on
- jb2602 Recorded by
-
Collections
Insects Tiger moths (Arctiinae) Moths (Lepidoptera)
Additional information
- 12mm to 25mm Animal size
Species information
- Thallarcha sparsana Scientific name
- Fair Footman Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Local native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- Up to 1638.4m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
- External link More information
-
Synonyms
Palene gracilis
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
