TEST

Epicoma contristis

1 Yellow-spotted Epicoma Moth at Red Hill, ACT

Epicoma contristis at Red Hill, ACT - 12 Dec 2019
Epicoma contristis at Red Hill, ACT - 12 Dec 2019
Request use of media

Identification history

Epicoma contristis 7 Jan 2020 GlennCocking
Epicoma contristis 6 Jan 2020 ibaird
Unidentified 6 Jan 2020 roymcd

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

5 comments

donhe wrote:
   7 Jan 2020
How do you distinguish E. tristis from E. contristis?
ibaird wrote:
   7 Jan 2020
Good question. Moths of Victoria ( two pages on the supporting disc to part 2) provide guidelines for separating the 5 Victorian species of Epicoma. The sexes are different and the rules they provide rely (in part) on knowing whether you have a male or a female. They say E. contristis and E. tristis are in their'dark-winged sub-grouping along with E. pontificalis. The white-winged group are largely night flying and are attracted to lights, especially the males. The dark-winged subgroup are rarely attracted to light but rest openly on vegetation during the day. In dark-winged males E. constristis the dark area around the discal spot is diffuse compared to E. tristis where it is confined. The ground colour almost black in E contristis, whereas the ground colour in E. tristis has a brownish tinge. E. constristis and E. tristis are both said to have a wingspan over 30 mm, whereas E . pontificalis has a wingspan Ășnder 32 mm', but also that species has a neat yellow forewing dot. uniformly mottled forewing, and an orange thorax distinguishing it from E. tristis and E. contristis. In the dark-wing females the dark area around the discal spot appears to be diffuse in E. tristis but confined in E. contristis (the reverse rule to the above). On these criteria I'm happy that this is probably E. contristis. PS perhaps we should review all our IDs of Epicomis in the light of these rules.
GlennCocking wrote:
   7 Jan 2020
I don't think we can I photos, and it is uncertain even with specimens, should keep them together
owenh wrote:
   7 Jan 2020
It appears the labels have been reversed on the images for the E. tristis and E. contristis females on the Moths of Victoria 'Separating Epicoma' page on the CD. The species pages for each (MoV2(2) CD) show images for both males and females as alike (not reversed) re the discal spot area id.
ibaird wrote:
   7 Jan 2020
Thanks Owen.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Additional information

  • 12mm to 25mm Animal size

Species information

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,893,031 sightings of 21,044 species in 9,272 locations from 12,889 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.