TEST

Guilleminea densa

Small Matweed at Uriarra Village, ACT

Guilleminea densa at Uriarra Village, ACT - 25 Mar 2017
Guilleminea densa at Uriarra Village, ACT - 25 Mar 2017
Guilleminea densa at Uriarra Village, ACT - 25 Mar 2017
Request use of media

Identification history

Guilleminea densa 30 Mar 2017 BettyDonWood
Guilleminea densa 30 Mar 2017 BettyDonWood
Alternanthera pungens 25 Mar 2017 MichaelMulvaney
Unidentified 25 Mar 2017 Mike

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

Significant sighting

MichaelMulvaney noted:

31 Mar 2017

A new weed from America not previously recorded in the ACT, though there is a 2004 record from just outside the border. Seems to eb mainly a weed of disturbed areas.

User's notes

Prostrate, stems about 30cm.

7 comments

BettyDonWood wrote:
   26 Mar 2017
Not Alternanthera pungens, whose outer periant segments are sort of papery and have sharp points. I don't think it is Alternanthera at all in fact. The flowers appear to be flattish with 5 lobes. It does not appear to be in the Biosecurity Queensland ID key. I ticked search fields herb habit, creeping, white flower, 5 petals, and flower size small or medium. None of the 53 weeds that resulted looked anything like this plant. It could be family Boraginaceae, but looks nothing like any weedy borage I know.
Mike wrote:
   31 Mar 2017
Additional photos (when plant was dry) showing habit and flowers.
BettyDonWood wrote:
   31 Mar 2017
It still does not look like Alternanthera pungens, which has lots of sharp pointed bracts around the flower clusters. See the photos in: http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/media/Html/alternanthera_pungens.htm
One of those images is a comparison between Alternanthera pungens and Guilleminea densa. Plantnet key to Amaranthaceae sates that flower clusters in Alternanthera are hairless, and in Guilleminea hairy. The hairs round the flowers are obvious in your photos.
   1 Apr 2017
Thanks for persevering with this one Betty a new species for both me and the ACT
Mike wrote:
   3 Apr 2017
Should I get rid f it? I can remove it and give it to science. Found a description and photo in 'Weeds of the South East'.
   3 Apr 2017
Yes please if you good get rid of the plants that would be great thanks Mike
Mike wrote:
   5 Apr 2017
Three plants collected for Herbarium. They have big woody roots. Updated abundance because I found another patch nearby (would have to be dug out).

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Additional information

  • True In flower
  • Less than 10cm Plant height

Species information

Record quality

  • Overall Fit for scientific/research use
  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,893,031 sightings of 21,044 species in 9,272 locations from 12,889 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.