TEST
Algae, Cyanobacteria, other bacteria and viruses
Sighting 3346692

Stigeoclonium sp.

a green algae at Paddys River, ACT

Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Stigeoclonium sp. at Paddys River, ACT - 1 Sep 2016 10:25 AM
Request use of media

Identification history

Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Stigeoclonium sp. 6 Sep 2016 MichaelMulvaney
Chaetophoraceae 3 Sep 2016 KenT
Chaetophoraceae 3 Sep 2016 KenT
Chaetophoraceae 3 Sep 2016 KenT

Identify this sighting

Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

Possibly a species of Stigeoclonium, maximum cell width to ten microns. Main image photographed with 20X objective, the remaining images photographed with 10X, 20X, 40X & 60X objectives. This filamentous algae was attached to a twig submerged in a swiftly flowing section of Paddy's River

31 comments

MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.
MichaelMulvaney wrote:
   7 Sep 2016
Stephen Skinner of the NSW Royal Botanic Gardens replied when I asked him to ID this species Much easier this time: Stigeoclonium species, and as the main axes are wider than the side branches, it probably fits S. helveticum. There is a paper on these in Australia in Telopea; Skinner, S. & Entwisle, T.J. (2004 a) Non-Marine Algae of Australia 5. Macroscopic Chaetophoraceae (Chaetophorales, Chlorophyta). Telopea 10: 613-633.
Well done to the photographer.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Species information

1,904,751 sightings of 21,315 species from 13,114 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.