Cath and Tony, MattM and I visited this site today and found some of them shriveled up and past their best, like this one: http://canberranaturemap.org/Community/Sightings/Details/1948166 But they look much smaller than O. hamatus in the flesh. Much smaller and lighter/weaker build, I am wondering if this sighting is not actually O. hamatus and could be O. aciculiformis?
I'm inclined to agree with you Aaron. O. hamatus tends to be a somewhat more stocky looking plant. The free points on the lateral sepals are not as curved and hooked as in O. hamatus.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,167,030 sightings of 20,573 species in 6,801 locations from 11,955 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.