TEST

Narrangullen, NSW

Announcements

21 Feb 2025

Hello NatureMaprs!This is an appeal to any current moderators or those looking to become a moderator. NatureMapr is now recieving an increased number of sightings from the NSW North Coast region (exci...


Continue reading

NatureMapr partners with NSW BCT on next phase of Land Libraries

Minor improvements

I'm glad we got attacked - platform outage update

Change to user profile page structure

Discussion

trevorpreston wrote:
8 Jan 2025
Thanks for your help with this genus @marcycad . I will try and get close ups of the flower spikes for ID in the future.

Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
marcycad wrote:
8 Jan 2025
X. australis is perhaps the most misunderstood taxa within the genus with various grass-tree species, not uncommonly, being misidentified as belonging to the Southern or Austral Grass-tree, probably because it is one of the most well-known.
X. glauca angustifolia is an almost identical species, other than genetical differences, what separates this taxon from X. australis is habitat, distribution and some very subtle morphological characteristics.
The geographical distribution X. australis was previously thought to be more widespread that what is now understood. Research undertaken and published in 2009 by (Bellete, M.P: The Biogeography and Ecology of Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia in South-eastern Australia.) highlighted that those populations once designated as X. australis occurring north of the DV in Victoria and west of the Range in NSW have actually been identified as belonging to the very similar-looking taxa, X. glauca angustifolia, a species that was once described as X. australis ‘eastern form’.
One of the most reliable means with which to separate the species is to observe and compare the packing-bract morphology over the flower spike. The mature packing-bracts of both species exhibit acute to triangular-shaped bracts, however X. glauca possess many non-mature bracts which are spathulate, X. australis flower spikes do not exhibit this characteristic.
X. australis niche tends to be the milder regions such as along the coastal fringes and along the eastern and southern aspects slopes and foothills of the Dividing Range. The inland locality of this specimen typically identifies with X. glauca angustifolia, a species better capable of tolerating the colder winter temperatures of inland tablelands.
The locality, the grass-trees at Burrinjuck would also have been misidentifications of X. australis and undoubtedly are X. glauca angustifolia based on updated information.

Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
BettyDonWood wrote:
21 Nov 2019
In order to be certain of the ID to species level of Xanthorrhoeas you need to look at the bracts surrounding the flowers, and the bracts between the flowers. This is a job for a specialist in Xanthorrhoea.
I have based this ID on known records at Burrinjuck. Australis is the common species there. There are a few records of glauca from the 1050s.

Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
1,885,544 sightings of 21,531 species from 13,367 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.