3 Narrow-wing Daisy at Bumbalong, NSW
Identification history
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
Significant sighting
Tapirlord noted:
22 Jul 2023
Apparently uncommon in the ACT region. Would be interested in additional records this coming spring.
User's notes
Plants returning after the Clear Range bushfire on 1 February 2020
132 comments
BettyDonWood
wrote:
30 Apr 2020
Possibly Brachyscome spathulata. Needs a side on photo of the whole plant and a godd photo of the leaves. A side on photo of a flower so that the bracts round the base of te flower head would also be helpful.
BettyDonWood
wrote:
30 Apr 2020
Possibly Brachyscome spathulata. Needs a side on photo of the whole plant and a godd photo of the leaves. A side on photo of a flower so that the bracts round the base of te flower head would also be helpful.
BettyDonWood
wrote:
30 Apr 2020
Possibly Brachyscome spathulata. Needs a side on photo of the whole plant and a godd photo of the leaves. A side on photo of a flower so that the bracts round the base of te flower head would also be helpful.
BettyDonWood
wrote:
30 Apr 2020
Possibly Brachyscome spathulata. Needs a side on photo of the whole plant and a godd photo of the leaves. A side on photo of a flower so that the bracts round the base of te flower head would also be helpful.
BettyDonWood
wrote:
30 Apr 2020
Possibly Brachyscome spathulata. Needs a side on photo of the whole plant and a godd photo of the leaves. A side on photo of a flower so that the bracts round the base of te flower head would also be helpful.
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
natureguy
wrote:
21 Jul 2023
Yes definitely quite plausible in that area, doesn;t look like B. spathulata (or any of the other options I can think of atm).
Location information
- Coordinates 149.114090-35.852819
- Altitude 984.2m
- Places Bumbalong, NSW
Sighting information
- 4 - 15 Abundance
- 27 Apr 2020 11:45 AM Recorded on
- Ad Recorded by
-
Collections
Photographic Competition - image of greatest conservation significance Significant Featured Plants Daisies AdamatBumbalong Canberra & Southern Tablelands NatureMapr
Species information
- Brachyscome willisii Scientific name
- Narrow-wing Daisy Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Rare or uncommon native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- 205.71m to 1379.37m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
- External link More information
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
