Thanks for the ID. Can this fungi affect stock such as horses, donkeys and alpacas (presuming they have a nibble)? Should we remove it as a noxious species. If so, what are our best options, if any? This area is being revegetated as a native wetland sanctuary but the exotic trees will remain until a time when the other native species are large enough to provide habitat (~10-15 years).
I don’t know what effect this fungus would have on livestock. Clearly, removal of the mushrooms would remove the potential for any animals eating them – but you’d need to keep checking to see if any new mushrooms have popped up. I don’t think you’d be able to remove the bulk of the fungus itself. What you see above ground are the ephemeral fruiting bodies, their functions being dispersal of spores. The bulk of the fungus consists of a network of fine threads in the soil. Furthermore this species forms a symbiotic association with exotic trees and that thread network penetrates the roots of those trees. While the trees are there the fungus would still be present and capable of producing those visible mushrooms.
It isn't possible at present to know what effect if any animal feeding on your fungus would have on the animal. The toxin(s) responsible isn't known see http://www.toxinology.com/poisonous_mushrooms/mushrooms_diagnosis1-ns.htm If you go back through the literature over the past 200 yrs you will see there is some disagreement regarding toxicity to humans, but definitely fatal in some poisonings. It seems that Paxillus involutus as it has been known over most of those 200 yrs is a species complex with some species remaining to be split off. This could partially account for reported differences in toxicity. This species hasn't been studied in Australia so it isn't known if across Australia it is a single species resulting from a single initial introduction with nursery stock or if it has come in multiple times from many countries. So it impossible to guess how poisonous the ones found in Australia are, but safest to assume they are poisonous to humans. There doesn't seem to be any information that shows mammals feeding on this species group. If your poplars are old then it is possible the fungus has been there since the trees were planted although there would have been a few years before the fungal fruit bodies appeared. If the property has been stocked since the poplars have been planted and no unexplained illness or deaths in the stock then it may be there is no concern. If there is a concern then the only practical solutions seem to either remove the trees or fence the area off- this would have to include the root zone.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,166,933 sightings of 20,573 species in 6,800 locations from 11,955 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.